Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChancellor, James D.
dc.contributor.authorClark, William Michael
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-06T17:15:26Z
dc.date.available2012-02-06T17:15:26Z
dc.date.created
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10392/3825
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation argues that the comparative method in the academic study of religion can be a valuable missiological tool for Christians. Chapter 1 explains the need for Christians to have an in-depth understanding of the Sunni worldview in order to better contextualize the gospel. Chapter 2 provides a history of the comparative method in the academic study of religion, and discusses the seven most common objections to the approach. Chapter 3 responds to the seven most common objections to the comparative approach, proposes a method of comparison, and presents this dissertation's case study. Chapter 4 begins with an overview of the Reformed worldview, and presents the themes found in the OT and NT concerning God's purposes behind the suffering of his people, and how his people should respond. Chapter 5 includes an overview of the Sunni worldview, and presents the themes found in the Qur' an and Sahih Al-Bukhiiri concerning God's purposes behind the suffering of his people, and how his people should respond. Chapter 6 compares the themes found in the Sunni and Reformed texts, and ends with a brief discussion of some missiological implications from the study. Chapter 7 summarizes the overall arguments and findings of the dissertation.en_US
dc.subjectSunnitesen_US
dc.subjectCalvinismen_US
dc.subjectSuffering--Religious aspects--Christianityen_US
dc.subjectMissionsen_US
dc.titleSuffering in the Sunni and Calvinist World Views: Demonstrating the Value of the Comparative Approach in the Study of Religion in Service of Christian Missionsen_US
dc.publisher.institutionSouthern Baptist Theological Seminaryen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record