A Historical-Theological Critique of the New Perspective on Paul

DSpace/Manakin Repository

A Historical-Theological Critique of the New Perspective on Paul

Show full item record

Title: A Historical-Theological Critique of the New Perspective on Paul
Author: O'Kelley, Aaron
Advisor: Allison, Gregg R.
Abstract: This dissertation argues that the new perspective on Paul rests on a faulty

heremeneutical presupposition. This presupposition is that covenantal nomism (as

advocated by E. P. Sanders as a proper conception of Second Temple Judaism) could not

have served as a foil for Paul in the development of a doctrine of justification that

resembles that of the Reformation. The presupposition is faulty because Sanders's

portrayal of Judaism as grace-based has no bearing on the categories that defined the

shape of the doctrine of justification during the Reformation period and beyond. The

study neither accepts nor rejects Sanders's portrayal of Judaism. Instead, it accepts

Sanders's claim for the sake of argument and then demonstrates that his claim does not

warrant a radical revision of the Reformation approach to the Pauline writings.

Chapter 1 demonstrates the strong dependence of the new perspective on

Sanders's work and the hermeneutical presupposition that his work Paul and Palestinian

Judaism has generated.

Chapter 2 sets the historical-theological background for the thesis by surveying

important works in the pre-Reformation Catholic scholastic period, as well as the decree

of the Council of Trent on justification, in order to demonstrate that, much like

covenantal nomism, the emerging Roman Catholicism of the late medieval and

Reformation periods was a grace-based, yet monocovenantal, religion.

Chapter 3 surveys the works of three prominent Reformers-Martin Luther,

Philip Melanchthon, and John Calvin-in order to demonstrate that what defines the

Reformation doctrine of justification is not grace per se but rather a doctrine of alien

righteousness, situated within a bicovenantal framework, in which there is an

uncompromising divine demand for perfect obedience.

Chapter 4 traces the same themes-perfect obedience, bicovenantalism, and

alien righteousness-into the post-Reformation period in order to demonstrate that these

are the categories that define the "old perspective" on Paul.

Chapter 5 summarizes the foregoing observations, argues that the new

perspective's hermeneutical presupposition is unwarranted, and then concludes with

exegetical observations that demonstrate a bicovenantal theology in Paul that is similar to

that of the Reformation doctrine of justification, one that could have easily arisen in the

context of a prevailing covenantal nomism.

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10392/3816
Date: 2010-05

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
3445601.pdf 6.041Mb PDF Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search BDL


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account